Judge Lawrence Vandyke Makes a Video Criticizing the Court’s Ruling on the California Magazine Ban
Judge Lawrence Vandyke makes a video criticizing the court’s ruling on the California magazine ban. This move shook the legal world. As a U.S.
Circuit Judge Lawrence Vandyke on the 9th Circuit felt his colleagues missed key facts about firearms. He posted an 18-minute Judge Lawrence Vandyke video on YouTube1.
In it, he handles guns to explain why the California magazine ban is wrong.
The case is Duncan v. Bonta. The court upheld the ban on magazines over 10 rounds. Circuit Judge Lawrence Vandyke dissented.
He said the majority saw magazines as mere accessories. But he showed they are core to how guns work. This Judge Lawrence Vandyke YouTube video speaks right to gun-savvy people. It uses simple demos to prove a point.
Learn more about U.S. judicial controversies and free speech debates.
Why Judge Lawrence Vandyke Took This Step
Judge Lawrence Vandyke is a Trump pick from 20192. He sits in San Francisco on the 9th Circuit. He saw the oral arguments.
California’s lawyer called big magazines extras, not protected by the Second Amendment. Judge Lawrence Vandyke knew better. He said many on the bench lack basic gun knowledge.
Explore Trump administration legal appointments and the federal court context.
In the Judge Lawrence Vandyke video, he starts with a mounted rifle. He wears his robe. He says all guns are “rendered inoperable” for safety.
Then he breaks down handguns. He swaps parts like grips, sights, and magazines. His goal? Show every part is key, just like magazines.
This ties to the California magazine ban ruling. The majority said bans limit “dangerous features” but leave guns usable.
Judge Lawrence Vandyke calls this nonsense. If magazines are accessories, so is everything else. That could gut the Second Amendment.
Key Moments in the Judge Lawrence Vandyke YouTube Video
- Explains cycling: Pull trigger, slide racks, ejects spent round, loads new one.
- Swaps parts: Changes magazine, grip, sights – gun still works, but changes.
- Slippery slope: Ban one part, ban all – no protected gun left.
He spliced in 3 minutes of court talk. This makes Judge Lawrence Vandyke’s dissent visual and clear.
The Ninth Circuit California Gun Ruling Breakdown
The en banc panel voted 7-4 to uphold the large-capacity magazine ban. Judge Susan Graber wrote the main opinion.
It reverses a lower court win for gun rights. The ban started in 2016. It stops the sale, making, or importing of magazines of over 10 rounds.
Read about government decisions and policy analysis shaping national debates.
Key majority points:
- Magazines are not “arms” under the Second Amendment.
- Even if accessories, ban fits the history of regulating dangerous weapons.
- People can own guns, bullets, and smaller magazines – just reload more.
Judge Lawrence Vandyke fights this in his Second Amendment dissent. He says the test is unworkable. How many rounds make a magazine “large”? His video shows why.
Other dissents came from Judges Ryan Nelson and Patrick Bumatay. They hit on panel makeup, too. Some judges went on senior status after the 2021 vote. But the court said it’s fine under the law.
This Ninth Circuit gun control decision keeps the California magazine ban in place for now. But an appeal to the Supreme Court is likely.
See more on legal and constitutional challenges in modern governance.
Judge Lawrence Vandyke Dissent Defends the Video
In writing, U.S. Circuit Judge Lawrence Vandyke pushes back. He says the video is conceptual, not new facts. It’s like drawings in opinions – allowed.
He mocks colleagues as “amateur gunsmithing colleagues.” Easy to show flaws, even a “caveman” could with a camera.
The video is the first of its kind. No other federal appeal has a judge-made YouTube dissent. Judge Lawrence Vandyke says visuals beat words here.
Backlash and Judicial Ethics Controversy
Judge Marsha Berzon led the attack. Her concurrence, joined by five others, including the chief, calls it “wildly improper.” Reasons:
- Facts outside the record.
- Judge Lawrence Vandyke acts as an expert witness.
- Bypasses rules for evidence.
They ignore the video in the ruling. Berzon worries it starts a bad trend.
Explore judicial ethics and accountability in leadership roles.
Professor David Levine from UC Law SF says he’s never seen a judge demo in video. Jacob Charles from Pepperdine calls it “performative advocacy.” Judges aren’t influencers.
But for pro-gun folks, this Federal judge’s YouTube video dissent is brave. It cuts through legalese.
How the Video Speaks to Gun Owners
You know firearms. You reload fast. You swap magazines in seconds. Judge Lawrence Vandyke makes a video criticizing the court’s ruling on the California magazine ban to show that.
He handles pistols:
- Glock-style: Standard magazine.
- Bigger one: More rounds, same fit.
- Reassemble: Add “dangerous” parts if misused.
Point: Magazine is integral. Ban it, ban the gun’s core function.
This fights firearm regulation lawsuit claims. The majority says reload pause is no big deal. Rarely need over 10 in self-defense. But stats show otherwise in some cases.
Real-World Firearm Mechanics
- Automatic cycling: Key to semi-auto guns.
- Magazine role: Feeds rounds without manual loading each time.
- Swap time: The Trained person does it in 1-2 seconds.
California gun control law ignores this. Gun rights in California 2025 hang on appeals.
California Magazine Ban Controversy History
The ban passed in 2016 via Prop 63. Challenges started fast.
Timeline:
- 2017: Judge Benitez blocks it.
- 2021: 9th Circuit panel agrees – unconstitutional.
- 2023: En banc rehearing.
- Now: Upheld, but California magazine ban update 2025 pending SCOTUS.
The lower court said magazines are arms. Common use for lawful purposes. The Bruen test from the Supreme Court helps gun rights.
But this appellate court ruling flips it. Text and history allow regulation.
California magazine ban Supreme Court is likely next. Past cases like Heller protect arms in common use.
Trump-Appointed Judge Gun Rights Stance
Judge Lawrence Vandyke fits the conservative mold. Before bench:
- Solicitor General in Montana and Nevada.
- Fought environmental rules.
- Pro-Second Amendment views are clear.
His conservative judicial philosophy shines. Dissents push originalism. Video adds court transparency and media twist.
Critics see political polarization in the judiciary. Supporters see truth-telling.
Read about political and judicial polarization in global and national contexts.
Details of the Gun-Filled YouTube Video
Nearly 19 minutes long. Starts with an apology for the quality. First time for Circuit Judge Lawrence Vandyke.
Setup: Chambers, robe, wall gun.
Demos:
- Break down the pistol.
- Explain slide, barrel, frame.
- Magazine insert/eject.
- Why size matters for function.
Conceptual: If a magazine accessory, ban grips next? Sights? Triggers?
These details of the Ninth Circuit judge’s gun-filled YouTube dissent make it powerful.
Second Amendment Court Cases Context
Post-Bruen, bans face scrutiny. No modern analog for total bans on common items.
Magazines over 10 rounds: Millions owned. Used in most pistols/rifles.
Second Amendment implications of California magazine ban ruling: Limits self-defense. Forces reload in threats.
VanDyke, California, ammo case highlights this.
Public and Legal Reactions
Gun groups cheer. NRA pushes the fight over the California magazine ban.
Media splits. Some call stunt. Others say educational.
Public reaction to Judge VanDyke’s YouTube gun demonstration: Mixed. Pro-gun love it. Others see an ethics issue.
Public reaction to federal judges: Debates free speech and the judiciary.
Explore public reactions to controversial leadership actions and policies.
California Magazine Ban Update: Paths Forward
For now, ban stands. Own old ones if registered correctly. No new.
California magazine ban appeal: SCOTUS petition coming.
The past California magazine ban overturned in moments gives hope. 2021 panel win.
Has the California magazine ban been overturned? No, but shaky.
California magazine ban update 2024: En banc loss.
California magazine ban update 2025: Watch the Supreme Court.
Ethics of Judges Using YouTube for Dissenting Opinions
Rare. Rules say written dispositions. Video attached – gray area.
Judge Lawrence Vandyke claims it’s an exhibit.
Berzon: No, outside record.
Learn about modern use of digital media in professional and ethical spaces.
How federal judges dissent on gun control cases: Usually writing. This new.
Dissenting opinions in U.S. courts: Vital for debate.
Lawrence VanDyke’s View on Firearm Restrictions in California
Clear: Overreach. Firearm legislation must respect core rights.
Video shows why Judge Lawrence VanDyke made a video about the California magazine ban: Visual proof.
What did Lawrence VanDyke say about the California ammo law ruling: Inept distinction.
Analysis of the Ninth Circuit’s California Gun Magazine Decision
Majority: Tradition allows component regs.
Dissent: No tradition for banning common mags.
Analysis: Bruen favors dissents.
Broader Constitutional Rights Debate
Second Amendment dissent pushes back on regs.
Federal judiciary controversy: Videos ok3?
Judge Lawrence Vandyke Reddit and Online Buzz
Forums light up. Gun subs share Judge Lawrence Vandyke Reddit threads. Praise for demos.
Updates on California Magazine Ban Calguns Forums
Cali gun owners track via Calguns. California magazine ban calguns threads explode post-ruling.
More on Judge Lawrence Vandyke Background
Born in North Dakota. Yale Law. Clerked for Justice Janice Rogers Brown.
Deputy at DOJ. Fought for religious liberty and gun rights.
Controversy over Trump-Appointed Judge’s Video Dissent
Trump-appointed judge gun rights: Pattern of strong 2A views.
Learn about media coverage of Trump-era figures and political allies.
FAQs
Conclusion
Judge Lawrence Vandyke makes a video criticizing the court’s ruling on the California magazine ban to highlight flaws in the 9th Circuit decision.
His demos prove magazines are essential, not extras. This bold Judge Lawrence Vandyke video aids the Second Amendment fight against the California magazine ban.
The ban stands, but SCOTUS may change that.
References
- KTVU: 9th Circuit judge criticized for posting video – Local news on the video and ruling. ↩︎
- LA Times: Trump-appointed judge dissents with video – Broader context for gun owners. ↩︎
- Daily Journal: Federal judge sparks uproar – Legal analysis for pros. ↩︎
